DAO proposal
Mango Markets exploiter said actions were ‘legal,’ but was it?
The $117 million Mango Markets exploiter has defended that their actions were ‘legal,’ but a lawyer suggests that they could still face consequences. Self-described digital art dealer Avraham Eisenberg, outed himself as the exploiter in a series of tweets on Oct. 15 claiming he and a team undertook a “highly profitable trading strategy” and that it was “legal open market actions, using the protocol as designed.” I believe all of our actions were legal open market actions, using the protocol as designed, even if the development team did not fully anticipate all the consequences of setting parameters the way they are. — Avraham Eisenberg (@avi_eisen) October 15, 2022 The Oct. 11 exploit worked through Eisenberg and his team manipulating the value of their posted collateral — the platforms’ n...
