Home » Fashion » Resale of the century: why luxury brands are watching Chanel vs WGACA

Share This Post

Fashion

Resale of the century: why luxury brands are watching Chanel vs WGACA

Resale of the century: why luxury brands are watching Chanel vs WGACA

Resale of the century: why luxury brands are watching Chanel vs WGACA

Creative Lab / Shutterstock.com

A trial involving Chanel highlights the application of the ‘nominative fair use’ doctrine, a key defence in the realm of second hand reselling, says Zach Briers of Munger, Tolles, and Olson.

A trademark infringement trial involving Chanel and a major luxury resale company will spotlight the apparel resale market, which has grown steadily in recent years and is now valued at approximately $211 billion.

The case is significant due to its broader implications for luxury brands navigating the secondhand market.

Chanel has accused luxury reseller WGACA of attempting to deceive consumers and selling allegedly infringing products. This legal battle not only underscores the clash between a high-profile luxury brand and a leading player in the secondhand market, but also brings to the forefront crucial questions surrounding brand protection, trademark usage, and the evolving dynamics of the luxury resale landscape.

Chanel, trademarks, WGACA, luxury, secondhand, nominative fair use, resale, apparel, handbags, market, brand protection, false advertising

Share This Post