Commensal lifestyle regulated by a negative feedback loop between Arabidopsis ROS and the bacterial T2SS – Nature Communications

By wazup on January 13, 2024 Comments Closed / 74 views

Abstract

Despite the plant health-promoting effects of plant microbiota, these assemblages also comprise potentially detrimental microbes. How plant immunity controls its microbiota to promote plant health under these conditions remains largely unknown. We find that commensal bacteria isolated from healthy Arabidopsis plants trigger diverse patterns of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production dependent on the immune receptors and completely on the NADPH oxidase RBOHD that selectively inhibited specific commensals, notably Xanthomonas L148. Through random mutagenesis, we find that L148 gspE, encoding a type II secretion system (T2SS) component, is required for the damaging effects of Xanthomonas L148 on rbohD mutant plants. In planta bacterial transcriptomics reveals that RBOHD suppresses most T2SS gene expression including gspE. L148 colonization protected plants against a bacterial pathogen, when gspE was inhibited by ROS or mutation. Thus, a negative feedback loop between Arabidopsis ROS and the bacterial T2SS tames a potentially detrimental leaf commensal and turns it into a microbe beneficial to the host.

The plant NADPH oxidase RBOHD is required for microbiota homeostasis in leaves

Article

30 June 2021

Sebastian Pfeilmeier, Gabriella C. Petti, … Julia A. Vorholt

Leaf microbiome dysbiosis triggered by T2SS-dependent enzyme secretion from opportunistic Xanthomonas pathogens

Article
Open access
03 January 2024

Sebastian Pfeilmeier, Anja Werz, … Julia A. Vorholt

A general non-self response as part of plant immunity

Article

17 May 2021

Benjamin A. Maier, Patrick Kiefer, … Julia A. Vorholt

Introduction

In nature, plants host diverse microbes called the plant microbiota¹. While the plant microbiota collectively contributes to plant health, they comprise microorganisms ranging from mutualistic to commensal, and pathogenic microbes². The property of microbes as mutualistic, commensal, and pathogenic depends on the host and environmental condition^3,4. Thus, the plant microbiota is not simply a collection of beneficial microbes, but various factors affect the property of microbes within the plant microbiota, which consequently determines plant health.

Upon recognition of microbial molecules, plants activate a battery of immune responses⁵. In the first layer of immunity, known as pattern-triggered immunity (PTI), plasma membrane-localized pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) recognize microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs). For instance, the PRR FLAGELLIN SENSING 2 (FLS2) and EF-TU RECEPTOR (EFR) sense the bacteria-derived oligopeptides flg22 and elf18, respectively, in Arabidopsis thaliana^6,7. BRI1-ASSOCIATED RECEPTOR KINASE 1 (BAK1) and its close homolog BAK1-LIKE 1 (BKK1) function as co-receptors for LRR-RLK-type PRRs such as FLS2 and EFR⁸. The LysM-RLK CHITIN ELICITOR RECEPTOR KINASE 1 (CERK1) is an essential co-receptor for fungal chitin and bacterial peptidoglycans⁹. Activated PRRs trigger various immune responses such as the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), calcium influx, MAP kinase activation, transcriptional reprogramming, and the production of defense phytohormones and specialized metabolites¹⁰. PTI contributes not only to pathogen resistance but also to the maintenance of healthy microbiota as evidenced by dysbiosis and disease symptoms observed on leaves of A. thaliana genotypes with severely impaired PTI responses^11,12. However, the molecular mechanism by which PTI-associated immune responses regulate microbial pathogens and maintain healthy microbiota remains unclear.

One prominent PTI output involves activation of the plasma membrane-localized NADPH oxidase RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOG D (RBOHD), which produces the ROS O₂^– in the extracellular space, which can then be readily converted to H₂O₂ via superoxide dismutase in the apoplast¹³. Extracellular ROS can be sensed by a plasma membrane-localized sensor and can be translocated into the cell to mediate plant immune responses¹⁴. Extracellular ROS can also directly exert cellular toxicity on microbes¹⁵. ROS functions in regulating not only resistance against pathogens, but also the composition and functions of the plant microbiota. For instance, RBOHD-mediated ROS production inhibits Pseudomonads in the A. thaliana rhizosphere¹⁶. RBOHD also prohibits dysbiosis in A. thaliana leaves by suppressing Xanthomonas L131 and the close strain L148, as indicated by their profuse colonization associated with disease onset on rbohD mutant plants upon inoculation with synthetic bacterial communities¹⁷. Plant RBOHD-mediated ROS induces the production of the phytohormone auxin in the beneficial bacterium Bacillus velezensis and promotes root colonization in A. thaliana¹⁸. These studies exemplify the importance of RBOHD-mediated ROS production in the regulation of plant microbiota. However, how ROS specifically regulates microbial metabolism and growth remains unknown. Furthermore, while ROS exhibits general cell toxicity to organisms, not all microbes are sensitive to plant-produced ROS. For instance, the growth of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pto) was not affected by mutation in RBOHD in A. thaliana¹⁹. This indicates that ROS exerts differential actions on microbes, but the basis for this selectivity needs to be explored.

Secretion systems are crucial for bacterial pathogens to efficiently infect the host plant through the secretion of effector proteins, among which the type III secretion system (T3SS) has been well documented as the essential pathogenicity component of many phytopathogenic bacteria²⁰. The key function of T3SS is to introduce type III effectors (T3Es) directly into the host cell, thereby suppressing plant immunity and promoting virulence²⁰. Some nitrogen-fixing rhizobacteria also utilize T3SS to promote symbiosis with their legume host^21,22. A number of T3Es have been identified to be recognized by the intracellular nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich repeat receptors (NLRs), activating effector-triggered immunity²³. These indicate the paramount significance of T3SS for the interaction between host and bacteria. In addition to T3SS, the type II secretion system (T2SS) has been shown to be necessary for the pathogenesis of many phytopathogenic bacteria and functions to secrete enzymes to degrade host barriers and promote virulence²⁰. Interestingly, the root commensal Dyella japonica MF79 requires the T2SS components gspD and gspE to release immune-suppressive factors that help the root colonization of a non-immune suppressive commensal in A. thaliana²⁴. However, whether and how plant immunity controls T2SS activity of its microbiota remains unknown.

In this study, we investigated the impact of A. thaliana immune responses on commensal bacteria isolated from healthy A. thaliana plants with a focus on RBOHD-mediated ROS. Using a bacterial random mutagenesis screen and in planta bacterial transcriptomics, we revealed that RBOHD-mediated ROS directly suppresses T2SS of a potentially harmful Xanthomonas L148, which makes Xanthomonas L148 a commensal. Moreover, this “tamed” Xanthomonas increased host resistance against the bacterial pathogen Pto.

Results

Different commensal bacteria trigger diverse ROS production patterns via distinct mechanisms

We investigated variations in immune responses triggered by the colonization of different commensal bacteria in A. thaliana leaves with ROS production as the readout. First, we measured ROS production in leaves of fls2, efr, cerk1, fls2 efr cerk1 (fec), bak1 bkk1 cerk1 (bbc), and rbohD mutants as well as Col-0 wild-type plants in response to the MAMPs flg22, elf18, and chitin heptamer. ROS production was dependent on the corresponding (co)receptor and RBOHD, indicating the suitability of our experimental system (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. S1). Next, we measured ROS production in leaves of the same mutant panel in response to taxonomically diverse 20 live and heat-killed commensal bacterial strains (Fig. 1d) that were previously isolated from healthy A. thaliana leaves and roots as well as soil²⁵ and that were used for plant-bacterial co-transcriptomics²⁶. These commensal bacteria triggered diverse ROS production patterns in a RBOHD-dependent manner which is consistent with the recent finding using heat-killed cells of leaf-isolated strains¹⁷. For instance, both live and heat-killed Pseudomonas L127 triggered ROS production with the heat-killed bacteria eliciting stronger ROS production, which is a general trend for all commensal bacterial strains (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. S2). On the other hand, only heat-killed but not live Burkholderia L177 triggered ROS production. Further, neither the live nor the heat-killed Flavobacterium R935 triggered ROS production (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. S2). We observed neither obvious phylogenetic signatures predictive for the capability to induce ROS, nor of the tissue of origin from which these commensals were isolated. We also observed different dependencies of commensal bacteria-induced ROS on the MAMP (co)receptors. For instance, ROS production by both live and heat-killed Exiguobacterium L187 was dependent on EFR but not FLS2 and CERK1. This EFR dependency for commensal bacteria-induced ROS production was observed for other strains, since many of which had reduced or lost ROS burst for efr leaf disks but considerable ROS signals were detected for fls2 and cerk1 (Supplementary Fig. S2). These results suggest that the recognition of EF-Tu-derived peptides via EFR is the primary mechanism for ROS production by commensal bacteria in A. thaliana leaves. However, there were commensal bacteria such as Pseudomonas L127 that stimulated ROS in fec and bbc mutant plants (Supplementary Fig. S2), indicating that MAMPs other than flg22, elf18, and peptidoglycans are responsible for ROS production induced by commensal bacteria in some cases.

**Fig. 1: Immunogenic and colonization profile of microbiota members in mono-associations.**

Plant-derived ROS differentially affects the colonization of commensal bacteria

We found that ROS production by all live and heat-killed commensal bacteria was completely dependent on RBOHD, indicating that RBOHD is mainly responsible for plant ROS production triggered by these commensal bacteria. Plant-produced ROS via RBOHD can affect the colonization of commensal bacteria. We then determined total and endophytic bacterial titers of different commensals in leaves of Col-0 wild-type and rbohD as well as fls2, efr, fec, and bbc mutant plants. We grew plants on agar plates for 14 days and flood-inoculated with individual commensal bacteria followed by the determination of bacterial titer (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Fig. S3). To our surprise, while we did observe increased colonization of some commensal bacteria in some of the MAMP (co)receptor mutants compared with Col-0 wild-type plants, we were largely unable to detect any impact of the rbohD mutation on either total or endophytic commensal colonization (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. S3). Also, there is no significant relationship between the ROS immunogenicity and the colonization capacity of the commensal bacteria (Supplementary Fig. S4). By contrast, both total and endophytic colonization of Xanthomonas L148 was dramatically increased in rbohD mutant compared with Col-0 wild-type plants (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. S3), suggesting that RBOHD-mediated ROS suppresses Xanthomonas L148 colonization, consistent with a recent finding¹⁷.

Xanthomonas L148 is detrimental to rbohD mutant but not Col-0 wild-type plants

Leaf colonization of rbohD mutant plants with live Xanthomonas L148 led to host mortality within 5 days post inoculation (dpi), in contrast to asymptomatic wild-type Col-0 plants (Fig. 2a). In an orthogonal system, we infiltrated leaves with Xanthomonas L148 and observed disease-like symptoms only in rbohD after 3 dpi (Fig. 2b–d). As Xanthomonas L148 activated ROS burst in Col-0 leaves, but not in rbohD, Xanthomonas L148 pathogenicity might be suppressed by the ROS pathway (Fig. 2e). Furthermore, Xanthomonas L148 not only persisted on the leaf surface but aggressively colonized the apoplast of rbohD mutants compared with Col-0 at 3 dpi (Fig. 2f). Together, Xanthomonas L148 is potentially pathogenic and its deleterious effect depends on the absence of RBOHD.

**Fig. 2: *Xanthomonas* L148 is detrimental to *rbohD* mutant but not to Col-0 wild-type plants.**

Xanthomonas L148 in vitro growth is largely unaffected by ROS

Due to their highly reactive nature, ROS can oxidize bacterial components, which can lead to extensive cellular damage. This might explain why Xanthomonas L148 is pathogenic to rbohD mutant but not to Col-0 wild-type plants. We tested the sensitivity of Xanthomonas L148 to ROS compounds by instantaneous in vitro exposure to H₂O₂ or O₂⁻¹. To our surprise, Xanthomonas L148 seemed to tolerate acute treatments with ROS and retained viability up to H₂O₂ and O₂⁻¹ concentrations of 1 mM (Supplementary Fig. S5a, b). Similar findings were obtained when a ROS-generating compound, paraquat (PQ, Supplementary Fig. S5c), was used. It can be argued that the adverse effects of ROS in vitro can only be observed upon continuous ROS treatment. However, we did not observe any significant effects on the growth rates of Xanthomonas L148 upon chronic exposure to PQ (Supplementary Fig. S5d). This suggests that the rampant proliferation of Xanthomonas L148 in rbohD plants is not due to the direct microbiocidal effects of ROS but other mechanisms.

Xanthomonas L148 pathogenic potential is partially suppressed by the presence of other leaf microbiota members

Xanthomonas L148 was isolated from macroscopically healthy A. thaliana plants grown in their natural habitat, indicating that it is a constituent of the native leaf microbiota of A. thaliana. While Xanthomonas L148 was detrimental to rbohD mutant plants in a mono-association condition, it can be postulated that in a microbial community setting, Xanthomonas L148 is disarmed and rbohD plants become asymptomatic. To test this, we constructed a synthetic bacterial community which consists of nine leaf-derived isolates that were found to be robust leaf colonizers and cover the major phyla of the native bacterial microbiota of leaves^27,28,29, which we refer to as LeafSC (Supplementary Fig. S6a, please see Supplementary Data 1 for the strain details). We also assessed the dose-dependency of the disease onset by using different proportions of Xanthomonas L148 in relation to the entire LeafSC, with L148_P1 as a dose equivalent to that of each synthetic community member (Xanthomonas L148/LeafSC, 1:9), while L148_P9 is a dosage that is equal to the entire bacterial load of the synthetic community (Xanthomonas L148/LeafSC, 9:9). Flood inoculation of Col-0 and rbohD plants with the LeafSC did not result in any observable disease symptoms (Supplementary Fig. S6b and c). As expected, inoculation with Xanthomonas L148 resulted in substantial mortality of rbohD plants compared with Col-0 wild-type plants. The killing activity of Xanthomonas L148 was somewhat reduced in rbohD plants when other microbiota strains were present, but this counter effect was overcome when a higher dose of Xanthomonas L148 was used (Supplementary Fig. S6b and c). These findings imply that a functional leaf microbiota contributes to the partial mitigation of disease symptoms caused by Xanthomonas L148 in rbohD plants, possibly through niche occupancy, resource competition, or antibiosis.

Xanthomonas L148::Tn5 mutant screening unveils genetic determinants of its pathogenic potential

Xanthomonas L148 is a conditional pathogen and its virulence is unlocked in the absence of RBOHD in the plant host. We aimed to identify the bacterial genetic determinants of this trait through a genome-wide mutant screening. We developed and optimized a robust high-throughput screening protocol (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. S7a) and generated and validated a Xanthomonas L148 Tn5 mutant library (Supplementary Fig. S7b–d). Using the high-throughput protocol, this Tn5 mutant library was phenotyped for the loss-of-rbohD mortality. From 6,862 transposon insertional mutants, 214 candidate strains consistently failed to exert pathogenicity on rbohD mutant plants (Fig. 3b, See Supplementary Data 2 for the complete list of the candidate mutant strains). Most of the 214 strains did not exhibit significant defects in their in vitro growth parameters (growth rate, biofilm formation, and motility) in rich TSB medium or minimal XVM2 medium (Fig. 3c). We found that out of the 214 strains, only 124 had transposon insertions in genes with functional annotations. These strains were retested in a square plate agar format, and 18 bacterial mutants exhibited consistent loss-of-rbohD mortality (Fig. 3b). Out of these 18 strains, three showed very strong phenotypes, namely gspE::Tn5, alaA::Tn5, and rpfF::Tn5 (Fig. 3d–f). The candidate gene gspE encodes a core ATPase component of the T2SS; alaA encodes an alanine-synthesizing transaminase involved in amino acid metabolism; and rpfF encodes a synthase for diffusible signaling factor (DSF), a constituent of the quorum sensing machinery in bacteria (Fig. 3e).

T2SS, amino acid metabolism, and quorum sensing underpin the conditional pathogenicity of Xanthomonas L148

We re-evaluated the candidate mutant strains using leaf-infiltration assays. The results showed that the disease progression required live Xanthomonas L148 as heat-killed bacteria did not elicit the same response (Fig. 4a). Consistent with the previous systems (high-throughput and square plate set-ups), the mutant strains lost their capacity to cause disease symptoms on rbohD mutant plants (Fig. 4a). As shown before, wild-type Xanthomonas L148 exhibited increased colonization in both total and endophytic compartments of rbohD leaves. By contrast, gspE::Tn5 mutant exhibited comparable endophytic colonization and slightly lower total leaf colonization capacities to Xanthomonas L148 wild-type in Col-0 leaves, but failed to show increased colonization in rbohD compared with Col-0 plants in contrast to wild-type L148 (Fig. 4b). On the other hand, alaA::Tn5 mutants had a compromised colonization capacity in Col-0 plants, while rpfF::Tn5 mutant strains colonized rbohD leaves to a similar extent to wild-type Xanthomonas L148. Nonetheless, all of the mutant strains not only persisted but were able to actively colonize the leaf endosphere (Fig. 4b). This indicates that gspE::Tn5 mutant retains its endophytic colonization ability, while its capacity to more efficiently colonize rbohD plants is compromised compared to wild-type L148. Correlation analysis revealed a negative relationship between host colonization and plant health, indicating that the observed leaf symptoms can be explained by the aggressive colonization of the wild-type strain (Fig. 4d).

**Fig. 4: T2SS, amino acid metabolism, and quorum sensing underpin conditional pathogenicity of *Xanthomonas* L148 in *rbohD* plants.**

None of the three mutant strains were defective in growth, biofilm production, or motility in rich TSB medium (Fig. 5a–c). Also, the mutant strains remained insensitive to PQ treatment, indicating retained tolerance to chronic ROS exposure (Fig. 5a). In vitro growth phenotypes were also unchanged in minimal XVM2 medium apart from an increase in biofilm production for gspE::Tn5 and alaA::Tn5 mutant strains (Fig. 5d). Secretion of extracellular enzymes acting on plant cell walls is a canonical strategy used by plant pathogens to breach the host’s physical barriers²⁰. Bacterial pathogens often utilize T2SS to deliver these enzymes into the apoplast of their plant host³⁰. We conducted enzyme secretion plate assays to test the proficiency of these strains to degrade different substrates (carbohydrates, protein, and lipids). Wild-type Xanthomonas L148 was able to secrete extracellular enzymes that can degrade the proteinaceous compounds gelatin and non-fat dry milk and the carbohydrates pectin and carboxymethyl-cellulose. Notably, gspE::Tn5 mutant could not degrade or to a lesser extent, these substrates in contrast to the wild-type and the other mutant strains, indicating impaired secretion activities (Fig. 5e, f). This suggests that the lack of disease progression in rbohD plants with the gspE::Tn5 mutant strain can be explained by its inability to secrete extracellular enzymes to degrade the host plant cell walls via T2SS.

**Fig. 5: The *Xanthomonas* L148 *gspE*::Tn5 mutant exhibits compromised extracellular secretion activity.**

To gain insight into the evolution of the pathogenicity of Xanthomonas L148, available genomes of other Xanthomonadales members, including the potentially pathogenic close-relative Xanthomonas L131¹⁷ and Xanthomonas L70 in the AtSPHERE²⁵, together with several Xanthomonas phytopathogens were interrogated for the occurrence of secretion systems and their potential CAZyme catalogs. In general, all Xanthomonadales strains encode both T1SS and T2SS genes (Supplementary Fig. S8a). The pathogenic and potentially pathogenic Xanthomonadales strains have expanded their CAZyme repertoire with proclivities for plant cell wall components: α-, β-glucans, α-mannans, arabinan, cellulose, hemi-cellulose, xylan, arabinoxylan, and pectin (Supplementary Fig. S8b, c). This indicates that though secretion systems are prevalent among the Xanthomonadales members, CAZyme repertoire expansion might be key feature of pathogenic and potentially pathogenic strains.

Because of the in planta, ex planta, and in vitro phenotypes, we focused on gspE::Tn5 mutant and characterized it extensively. To establish that gspE determines rbohD-dependent pathogenicity, we generated two independent gspE deletion mutant strains (ΔgspE_1 and ΔgspE_2) via homologous recombination. Both of the gspE deletion and the gspE::Tn5 mutants showed reduced secretion activities and failed to cause disease in rbohD plants (Fig. 6a, b). Taken together, gspE, an integral component of T2SS, is essential for Xanthomonas L148 pathogenicity on rbohD mutant plants.

**Fig. 6: The T2SS component *gspE* is a genetic determinant for the loss of the *rbohd*-dependent pathogenicity of *Xanthomonas* L148.**

Plant ROS suppresses T2SS genes including gspE of Xanthomonas L148

Xanthomonas L148 pathogenicity is exerted in the absence of ROS through RBOHD, while our in vitro results do not indicate general cellular toxicity of ROS. Thus, it can be assumed that RBOHD-mediated ROS production suppresses the virulence of Xanthomonas L148. To gain insight into this, we conducted in planta Xanthomonas L148 bacterial transcriptome profiling for Col-0 and rbohD plants²⁶. Plants were flood-inoculated with Xanthomonas L148 and shoots were sampled at 2 dpi, a time point at which bacterial titers were still indistinguishable; these later became significantly different between Col-0 and rbohD leaves at 3 dpi (Fig. 2f). Thus, with the bacterial transcriptomes observed at this time point, one can exclude the possibility that the differences in expression are due to the different bacterial population densities known to affect bacterial transcriptome³¹.

Principal component (PC) analysis revealed that in planta Xanthomonas L148 transcriptomes were distinct in Col-0 and rbohD plants (Fig. 7b). Statistical analysis revealed 2946 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) upon comparing in planta bacterial transcriptomes in Col-0 with rbohD leaves (threshold: q-values < 0.05): 563 genes were up-regulated and 2474 genes were down-regulated in Col-0 compared with rbohD plants, indicating global bacterial transcriptomic re-configuration upon leaf colonization as influenced by RBOHD (Fig. 7a and c, See Supplementary Data 3 for the details on DEGs). Differentially expressed genes in Col-0 compared with rbohD were captured as candidate genes in the Tn5 mutant screening (73 down-regulated and 29 up-regulated out of 214 candidates), but these candidate genes were rather under-represented (hypergeometric test, ***p-value = 1.00E-10). Most T2SS apparatus genes including gspE were down-regulated in Col-0 as compared to rbohD (Fig. 7c–e). Six Xanthomonas L148::Tn5 mutants have an insertion in genes annotated as CAZymes, five of which are significantly down-regulated in Col-0 as compared with rbohD inoculated plants. The significantly down-regulated CAZymes in Col-0 plants can potentially degrade plant cell wall components cellulose, pectin, α-glucan, β-glucan, and β-mannan (Fig. 7c, Supplementary Fig. S9). Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that upregulated gene clusters such as clusters 3, 9, and 14 are enriched for biological functions related to chemotaxis and attachment (K15125, K13924, and K05874), while gene clusters down-regulated in Col-0 such as clusters 8, 10, and 12 are enriched for pathways involved in transport and detoxification processes (K02014 and K00799, Fig. 7f, See Supplementary Data 4 for the clustering membership and the enriched GO terms).

**Fig. 7: Plant ROS suppresses T2SS genes including *gspE* of *Xanthomonas* L148.**

Upon closer inspection, expression of the identified candidate genes gspE and alaA was strongly repressed while rpfF was marginally downregulated in Col-0 compared to rbohD, which supports the hypothesis that these genes are required and thus regulated in immunocompetent wild-type Col-0 plants to prevent disease progression (Fig. 7g). These findings were re-confirmed in independent experiments using qRT-PCR where all the candidate genes were suppressed in Col-0 compared to rbohD plants (Fig. 7h). It can be postulated that ROS directly regulates the expression of these genes. Therefore, Xanthomonas L148 bacterial cells were grown in vitro in the presence of PQ followed by gene expression analysis. We found that the expression of the candidate genes gspE, alaA, and rpfF is suppressed in Xanthomonas L148 upon chronic exposure to ROS (Fig. 7i). Taken together, these findings suggest that Xanthomonas L148 colonization triggers RBOHD-mediated ROS production, which directly inhibits the expression of genes related to virulence, in particular components of T2SS on Col-0 plants. By contrast, the absence of ROS production in rbohD mutant plants switches on the pathogenicity of Xanthomonas L148, leading to disease onset.

RBOHD-mediated ROS turns Xanthomonas L148 into a protective bacterium

The phyllosphere microbiota are known to confer protection against foliar pathogens³² and thus even a conditionally pathogenic microbiota member may provide beneficial services to its plant host. To address this question, Col-0 and rbohD plants were pre-colonized with wild-type Xanthomonas L148 or gspE::Tn5 mutant strain for 5 days and were then challenged with the bacterial pathogen Pto. Bacterial titers of Xanthomonas L148 and Pto were determined for the endophytic and total leaf compartments at 0 and 3 dpi. As Xanthomonas L148 killed rbohD mutant plants, we were not able to measure Pto titers under this condition. Pre-colonized Col-0 plants with either the wild-type Xanthomonas L148 or gspE::Tn5 mutant had increased resistance against Pto (Fig. 8a–c). Interestingly, rbohD mutant plants pre-colonized with gspE::Tn5 strain showed increased resistance against Pto (Fig. 8a, c). Further, Col-0 and rbohD plants pre-colonized with gspE::Tn5 had slightly better plant performance than the non-inoculated plants after Pto challenge (Supplementary Fig. S10a, b). This also indicates that the protective role of Xanthomonas L148 is genetically uncoupled from the gspE-dependent pathogenic potential. Invasion by Pto did not result in a significant decline in Xanthomonas L148 and gspE::Tn5 populations (Fig. 8b), indicating a strong colonization competence and resistance of the commensal Xanthomonas L148 against pathogen invasion. In summary, these results suggest that RBOHD-produced ROS turns the potentially harmful Xanthomonas L148 into a protective bacterium against aggressive pathogen colonization.

**Fig. 8: RBOHD-mediated ROS turns *Xanthomonas* L148 into a beneficial bacterium.**

Discussion

Despite extensive studies on how plants recognize microbes and transduce signals within the plant, how immune outputs control the growth and behavior of microbes is still largely unknown. Furthermore, we mostly lack a mechanistic explanation for why certain microbes are sensitive to particular immune responses. In this study, we have investigated the impact of the RBOHD-mediated ROS burst as an early immune output on 20 taxonomically diverse bacteria isolated from healthy A. thaliana plants and demonstrated the poor association between RBOHD-mediated ROS burst and bacterial colonization (Supplementary Fig. S4). These findings suggest that Arabidopsis recognizes commensal bacteria and produces ROS that does not have a detectable impact on most commensal bacterial colonization. This highlights the notion that the perception of the microbial signal, followed by the cascade of immune signals, and immune execution leading to the restriction of microbial colonization are distinct events. This corroborates our previous finding that plant and transcriptome responses of commensal bacteria are largely uncoupled during an early stage of infection²⁶. Plant responses to MAMPs do not necessarily affect the consequence of plant-microbe interactions. This makes sense because MAMPs derived from pathogenic or mutualistic bacterium can induce the same PTI responses^33,34. Also, different types of MAMPs or its variants can elicit quantitatively different intensities of immune responses and detection of these molecular patterns might not essentially result in the same immune outputs and different immune readouts are activated by different MAMPs or to the catalog of MAMPs that a particular microbe possesses^35,36,37,38. Thus, the perception of the nuanced compendium of stimuli, triggering the cascade of signals, and the eventual impact of plant immune responses on microbes are tailored for each microbial strain. In this study, we have revealed a mechanism in which RBOHD-mediated ROS changes the growth and behavior of a leaf commensal, Xanthomonas L148. This is a significant advance in our understanding of how plant immune responses manipulate the growth and behavior of its potentially pathogenic microbiota members.

We have demonstrated that plant ROS allows co-habitation with a potentially pathogenic leaf microbiota member, Xanthomonas L148 by modulating its behavior. Our results show that the plant host constrains proliferation of this microbiota member by means of ROS as a molecular message to allow cooperation and coexistence. Ecological and reductionist studies have revealed that potentially pathogenic strains populate plant hosts without causing disease, and these strains are considered as bona fide constituents of the plant microbiota^29,33,39,40. Some of these potentially detrimental strains can be deleterious to the host in mono-associations^{29,33,39,40,41,42}^. However, the adverse effects of these potentially pathogenic microbes depend on the host, the environment, and the co-occurring microbes^{17,39,40,41,42,43,44,45}. It has been shown that simultaneous defects in PTI and the vesicle trafficking pathway under high humidity led to dysbiosis in the phyllosphere and plant disease^11,12. It appears to be a universal pattern across multicellular organisms that ROS modulates the structure, composition, and function of microbiota. In mice, a decrease in mitochondria-derived ROS is associated with increased gut microbiota diversity⁴⁵. Also, ROS produced via the NOX1 pathway in the colon drives anaerobic growth of Citrobacter rodentium and in turn remodel the epithelial milieu⁴⁶. In plants, ROS induces the phytohormone auxin secretion by a beneficial rhizobacterium Bacillus velezensis to protect against the damaging effects of plant-derived ROS, allowing efficient root colonization of B. velezensis¹⁸. ROS production in roots constrains Pseudomonas establishment in the rhizosphere¹⁶. It has also been genetically shown that RBOHD-mediated ROS production is integral for maintaining leaf microbiota homeostasis by keeping potentially harmful bacterial members at bay¹⁷. Nevertheless, the mechanisms by which the plant host selectively constrains potentially pathogenic members of the microbiota and whether these strains are functional to their host remains unclear. Here, through a bacterial genome-wide transposon mutant screen and in planta transcriptomics, we have revealed that plant ROS acts as a signaling cue for the potentially pathogenic commensal Xanthomonas L148 to suppress its virulence by downregulating its T2SS while promoting its beneficial function. While the massive bacterial transcriptomic landscape reprogramming can be attributed to versatile roles of RBOHD¹³ such as cell wall remodeling^47,48, host signaling⁴⁹, and stomatal response^50,51, our in vitro experiments support the notion that ROS produced by RBOHD modulates the behavior of the Xanthomonas L148.

Other members of the phyllosphere microbiota may partially contribute to attenuating the deleterious effects of Xanthomonas L148. However, RBOHD is needed for full suppression of L148 deleterious activity in the community context (Supplementary Fig. S6), which is consistent with the observation that Xanthomonas L131, a closely-related strain of L148, exerts its detrimental impact on rbohD mutant plants in a community context¹⁷. Closely related, innocuous strains of the plant microbiota out-compete or antagonize its potentially pathogenic counterparts, thereby preventing disease progression but enabling the persistence and co-existence of these strains in nature^23,41. However, this phenomenon is accession and strain-specific as this commensal-mediated protection is lost in some plant genotypes and a particular harmful Pseudomonas strain predominates the microbial community⁴¹. Thus, allowing potentially pathogenic strains within the microbiota requires stringent control of their function and behavior by host immunity sectors and is facilitated in parts by other members of the plant microbiota.

We have demonstrated that the pathogenicity of Xanthomonas L148 depends on the T2SS component gspE (Figs. 3d–f and 6a, b). The loss of the killing effect of gspE::Tn5 mutants strains on rbohD mutant plants can be explained by its compromised secretion activities and hampered colonization of rbohD leaves (Figs. 4b, 5e, f, 6a, b, Fig. 7c, and Supplementary Fig. 9a, b). Consistently, the same gene was recently found to be causal for leaf degradation and virulence of Xanthomonas L148 in rbohD plants, functioning to help releasing substrates for other leaf commensals, consequentially driving the phyllosphere microbiota composition⁵². T2SS is often utilized by plant pathogens to deliver CAZymes which degrade plant cell walls, allowing host invasion and promoting disease³⁰. For instance, T2SS allows the root commensal Dyella japonica MF79 to efficiently colonize the host and is required for virulence of pathogenic Dickeya dadantii^24,53. These, together with our findings, suggest an important role of T2SS in the establishment of microorganisms in host tissues, making it conceivable that it is targeted by the host to manipulate microbial behavior. Secreted CAZymes could also trigger immune responses such as ROS burst via direct recognition of the CAZyme as a MAMP or release of recognized plant-derived Damage Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs) due to their enzymatic action^54,55,56. Indeed, we have shown that live T2SS-deficient gspE::Tn5 L148 mutant elicited less ROS than wild-type L148, whereas heat-killed wild-type L148 and gspE::Tn5 mutant elicited undistinguishable ROS burst, implying that T2SS-mediated CAZyme secretion may further enhance the ROS response (Fig. 4c). Plant ROS might act as a counter-defense of L148 invasion via CAZymes by dampening T2SS expression (Fig. 7c, Supplementary Fig. 9a, b). The gspE::Tn5 mutant had similar leaf endophytic but slightly reduced total colonization in wild-type Col-0 plants compared with wild-type L148. However, the gspE::Tn5 mutant did not show increased colonization in rbohD in contrast to wild-type L148 (Fig. 4b). This suggests that ROS functions to attenuate T2SS activity albeit incomplete and makes Xanthomonas L148 a commensal bacterium in wild-type Col-0 plants. Thus, we propose a model according to which the interaction of Xanthomonas L148 and Col-0 plants is based on a delicate balance driven by host ROS levels, resulting in a negative feedback loop to control the potentially pathogenic commensal (Fig. 8c). Our genetic screening and in planta bacterial transcriptome analysis (Figs. 3b and 7a; Supplementary Data 2 and 3) also suggest that the conditional pathogenicity of Xanthomonas L148 depends on multiple pathways including amino acid metabolism (alaA, DAO, speD, and prnA), quorum sensing and bacterial signaling (rpfF, rsbu_P), surface adhesion (sphB1, pilD), and antioxidant metabolism (ubiB). Moreover, the plant protective function of Xanthomonas L148 against the pathogen Pto is not genetically coupled with its gspE-dependent pathogenic potential, as the gspE::Tn5 mutant can still confer significant resistance against Pto in both Col-0 and rbohD mutant plants (Fig. 8a, Supplementary Fig. S10a, b). The gspE::Tn5 mutant provided better pathogen protection to Col-0 plants than the wild-type Xanthomonas L148 despite its lesser leaf colonization, suggesting that efficient colonization does not necessarily translate to pathogen protection. This finding is in line with the recent finding in which a number of microbiota strains that robustly colonize did not confer plant protection against pathogen attack³². The mechanisms by which the ROS-tamed Xanthomonas L148 confers pathogen protection warrants further investigation. Our finding that RBOHD-mediated ROS targets Xanthomonas T2SS provides a mechanism and concept that plant immunity surveils potentially detrimental members of the plant microbiota by suppressing T2SS via ROS.

We have revealed different ROS burst patterns in response to individual members of the plant microbiota that can be categorized into three classes of immune reactivity: immune-active strains can elicit ROS with intact cells; immune-evasive strains only induce ROS when they are heat-killed; and immune-quiescent strains do not elicit ROS whether alive or dead (Fig. 1c, d and Supplementary Fig. S2). Immune-evasive strains can possibly conceal their detection by preventing MAMP release or secrete proteins that degrade/sequester self-derived MAMPs or that target host immune components to suppress immune activation⁵⁷.

We have observed that most microbiota members of A. thaliana are perceived through the surface-resident PRR EFR (Supplementary Fig. S2), indicating that EF-Tu peptides serve as major bacterial molecules eliciting defense programs in our experimental setup. Consistent with this, a number of strains increased colonization in efr mutant plants compared to wild-type Col-0, which emphasizes the fundamental link of microbial perception with bacterial colonization (Supplementary Fig. S3). Our observation also coincides with a GWAS study in which EFR was found as a plausible genetic determinant of responses to varying MAMP epitopes in natural populations of A. thaliana⁵⁸. Although EFR is a Brassicaceae lineage-specific innovation⁷, other EF-Tu fragments seem to be recognized by yet-unknown receptors and are immunogenic to some rice cultivars⁵⁹. Also, interfamily transfer of A. thaliana EFR to solanaceous species is sufficient to confer broad-spectrum resistance to pathogens, indicating that components acting downstream of EFR perception are at least in parts evolutionarily conserved⁶⁰. These findings suggest that EF-Tu peptides might be a prevalent microbial motif for host detection in various plant species.

Emerging evidence suggests that plant immunity modulates microbial processes required for virulence in addition to its effects on general microbial metabolism, including protein translation^31,61. For instance, the secreted aspartic protease SAP1 inhibits Pto growth by cleaving the Pto protein MucD in A. thaliana leaves⁶². Plants target the iron acquisition system of Pto to inhibit Pto growth during effector-triggered immunity³¹. The defense phytohormone salicylic acid and the specialized metabolite sulforaphane inhibit the type III secretion system of pathogenic Pto^61,63. Our finding is consistent with the notion that plant immunity targets microbial virulence to allow microbes to cohabit, which can be a better plant strategy than eliminating microbes as plants need to maintain a functional microbiota and potentially harmful microbes can even provide a service to the host.

Methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

The A. thaliana Col-0 accession was the wild-type and the genetic background of all the mutants utilized in this study. The mutants fls2⁶ (SAIL_691C4), efr⁷ (SALK_068675), cerk1⁹ (GABI_096F09), fec¹¹, bbc¹¹, and rbohD¹³ (atrbohD D3) were previously described. For agar plate assays, seeds were sterilized with Cl₂ gas for 2 h⁶⁴. Seeds were then stratified for 2–3 days at 4 °C on 0.5 × Murashige and Skoogs (MS) medium agar with 1% sucrose, germinated for 5 days, and subsequently transplanted to 0.5 × MS plates without sucrose. Plants were grown in a chamber at 23 °C/23 °C (day/night) with 10 h of light. Then, 14-day-old seedlings were inoculated with bacterial strains and were harvested or phenotyped at the indicated time points. For ROS burst and infiltration patho-assays, plants were grown in greenhouse soil for 5–6 weeks in a chamber at 23 °C/23 °C (day/night) with 10 h of light and 60% relative humidity (See Supplementary Data 5 for details of the plant genotypes used).

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

All the bacterial strains derived from the AtSPHERE were previously described²⁵. Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pto) and Pto lux were described previously^65,66. All bacterial strains were grown in 0.5x Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) for 24 h, harvested through centrifugation, washed twice with sterile water, and diluted to the appropriate OD₆₀₀ (See Supplementary Data 1 for the list of bacterial strains used).

ROS burst measurement

ROS burst was determined as in Smith and Heese, 2014 with slight modifications⁶⁷. In brief, bacterial strains were grown in TSB at 28 °C for 16–18 h with shaking at 200 rpm. Cells were harvested, washed twice with sterile water, and diluted to OD₆₀₀ = 0.5 in sterile water. The day before the assay, leaf discs (4 mm) from leaves of the same physiological state and size from 5-to-6-week-old plants grown in a chamber at 23 °C/23 °C (day/night) with 10 h of light were harvested, washed twice with sterile water every 30 min, immersed in sterile water in 96-well plates, and incubated in the same growth chamber for 20 h. Prior to the assay, the elicitation solution was prepared by adding 5 µL 500x horseradish peroxidase (HRP, P6782-10MG, Sigma-Aldrich) and 5 µL 500x luminol (A8511-5G, Sigma-Aldrich) to 2.5 mL of bacterial suspension, 1 µM MAMP solutions (flg22 [ZBiolab inc.], elf18 [Eurofins], chitinDP7 [N-acetylchitoheptaose, GN7, Elicityl]), or sterile nanopure water as mock. During the assay, the water was carefully removed from the 96 well-plate and 100 µL of the elicitation solution was added to the 96-well plate. With minimal delay, the luminescence readings were obtained for 60 min using a luminometer (TrisStar2 Multimode Reader, Berthold).

Commensal bacterial colonization assay

To prepare the bacterial inoculum, all bacterial strains were grown in 0.5× TSB for 24 h, harvested through centrifugation, washed twice with sterile water, and suspended in sterile water (final OD₆₀₀ = 0.005). Two-week-old seedlings grown on 0.5× MS medium agar in a chamber at 23 °C/23 °C (day/night) with 10 h of light were flood-inoculated with these bacterial suspensions (15 mL per plate, incubated for 1 min), drained, air-dried for 5 min and then incubated in the same growth chamber. Leaf samples were aseptically harvested at 3 to 5 dpi, weighed, and plated for two compartments: for the total compartment, leaves were directly homogenized in 10 mM MgCl₂ with a homogenizer (TissueLyser III, Qiagen), serially diluted with 10 mM MgCl₂, and plated on 0.5 × TSB agar; for the endophytic compartment, leaves were surface-sterilized with 70% ethanol for 1 min, washed twice with sterile water, homogenized, serially diluted, and then plated as for the total compartment. Colonies were allowed to grow at 28 °C, and photographs were taken for 1–3 days. Colonization was expressed as cfu mg⁻¹ sample.

Generation of bacterial mutants

A Xanthomonas L148::Tn5 library was constructed via conjugation of Xanthomonas L148 with E. coli SM10λpir harboring puTn5TmKm2⁶⁸ in which both strains were mixed in equal portions (OD₆₀₀ = 0.10), spot-plated on TSB medium, and incubated for 2 d at 28 °C. The resulting mating plaques were diluted and plated on TSB with kanamycin and nitrofurantoin for selection for L148 transformants and counter-selection against E. coli, respectively. To constitute the entire library, around 7000 individual colonies were picked, re-grown in 0.5 × TSB, aliquoted for glycerol stocks, and stored at −80 °C. Around 20 strains from this Xanthomonas L148::Tn5 library were randomly selected for confirmation of Tn5 insertion in the genome via nested PCR (first PCR with primers FDE117 and FDE118; second PCR with primers FDE119 and mTn5AC) and the final amplicons were Sanger-sequenced (see Supplementary Data 6 for details). For the generation of targeted deletion mutants for gspE, the pK18mobsacB suicide plasmid⁶⁹ (GenBank accession: FJ437239) was PCR linearized (primers FDE234 and FDE235) with Phusion Taq polymerase (F-5305, Thermo Scientific); 750 bp of upstream (primers FDE278 and FDE279) and downstream (primers FDE280 and FDE281) flanking regions of gspE coding sequence with terminal sequences overlapping with the linearized pK18mobsacB were amplified using Phusion Taq polymerase (F-5305, ThermoScientific) and were sequence-verified. The plasmid construct was assembled using Gibson cloning⁷⁰ (E5510S, New England Biolabs) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The plasmid construct was transformed into E. coli cells (DH5α strain) and then delivered into Xanthomonas L148 via triparental mating with the helper strain pRK600⁷¹. Transformants were selected using kanamycin and nitrofurantoin and the second homologous recombination was induced with sucrose in 0.5× TSB. The deletion mutants were individually picked and stored at −80 °C in glycerol stocks and were verified by PCRs (using primers FDE196 and FDE197 for the presence of the plasmid with the inserts; primers FDE125 and FDE126 for the presence of gspE gene in the genome; and primers FDE279 and FDE280 for the removal of gspE gene in the genome) and Sanger-sequencing, and were plated on 0.5× TSB containing 10 μg/mL kanamycin. True deletion mutants should not contain the plasmid, lose the gspE gene, and be sensitive to kanamycin (See Supplementary Data 6 for list of primers and PCR profile used).

L148::Tn5 library 96-well screening

Seedlings of rbohD were grown in 96-well plates with 500 μL 0.5× MS agar with 1% sucrose for each well and incubated in a growth chamber at 23 °C/23 °C (day/night) with 10 h of light for 14 days. Concomitantly, the Tn5 insertion mutants (~7000 individually picked colonies) were grown in 96-well plates with TSB at 28 °C for 3 days with 200 rpm agitation till saturation. The resulting bacterial suspension was diluted six times (resulting in a concentration of ~6 × 10⁹ bacterial cells per mL) and 20 µL aliquots were inoculated onto the seedlings. Plants were phenotyped for survival after 5 days. The resulting 214 Xanthomonas L148::Tn5 candidate strains which showed the loss of the rbohD killing activity from the two independent 96-well plate screenings were genotyped to identify the Tn5 insertion locus in the genome via nested PCR (first PCR with primers FDE117 and FDE118; second PCR with primers FDE119 and mTn5AC) and the final amplicons were Sanger-sequenced (see Supplementary Data 6 for list of primers and PCR profile used and Supplementary Fig. S7). The 124 Xanthomonas L148::Tn5 candidate mutants which have insertions on genes with functional annotations (please see Supplementary Data 2 for the list) were further screened using plants grown in agar plates to re-evaluate the phenotypes as described for the commensal bacterial colonization assay.

In vitro assays

For instantaneous ROS treatment, Xanthomonas L148 was grown for 24 h, pelleted, and diluted to OD₆₀₀ = 0.02. A 500 µL of the bacterial suspension was mixed with H₂O₂ (H10009-500ML, Sigma-Aldrich) at final concentrations of 0–2000 µM, incubated for 30 min, and plated for colony counts. Similarly, 500 μL of the bacterial suspension was mixed with 1 mM xanthine (X7375-10G, Sigma-Aldrich) and 10 U/mL xanthine oxidase from bovine milk (X4875-10UN,Sigma-Aldrich) to generate O₂⁻¹, and samples were plated at different time points (1 mol of xanthine is converted to 1 mol O₂⁻¹ with 1 U xanthine oxidase at pH 7.5 at 25 °C in a min, thus 0, 2, 4, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 80 min incubations should have produced O₂⁻¹ equivalent to 0, 50, 100, 250, 500, 1000, 2000 µM respectively) for colony counts. Chronic exposure to ROS was implemented by growing the strains in TSB ± 10 µM paraquat (856177-1 G, Sigma-Aldrich), a ROS-generating compound, for 3 days while obtaining OD₆₀₀ readings using spectrophotometer (Tecan Infinite Microplate reader M200 Pro) to calculate growth curves and rates. The candidate Xanthomonas L148::Tn5 mutants were phenotyped in vitro via growing bacterial culture with an initial inoculum of 10 µL OD₆₀₀ = 0.1 in 96-well plates supplemented with 140 µL TSB or XVM2 (a minimal medium designed for Xanthomonas strains⁷²) for 3 days while obtaining absorbance readings at OD₆₀₀ using a spectrophotometer (Tecan Infinite Microplate reader M200 Pro) to calculate growth curves and rates. The resulting cultures were gently and briefly washed with water and cells adhering on the plates were stained with 0.1% crystal violet (27335.01, Serva) for 15 min. The staining was solubilized with 125 μL 30% acetic acid (A6283, Sigma-Aldrich) to quantify biofilm formation at OD₅₅₀ using a spectrophotometer (Tecan Infinite Microplate reader M200 Pro). Motility was assayed by point-inoculating bacterial cultures (OD₆₀₀ = 0.1) on 0.5× TSB with 0.8% agar and colony sizes were measured after 2 to 3 days. Secretion activities were profiled via point-inoculating (1 µL culture, OD₆₀₀ = 0.1) bacterial strains on 0.5× TSB agar with 0.1% substrate-of-interest (carbohydrates: pectin, carboxymethyl-cellulose, α-cellulose, xylan, starch; protein: milk and gelatin; lipid: Tween 20), incubated at 28 °C for 2 days. For gelatin, halo of degradation was visualized by incubating the plates in saturated ammonium persulfate for 15 min. For carbohydrates, clearance zones were visualized by staining the plates with 0.1% Congo red (C-6767, SigmaAldrich) for 15 min followed by washing with 6 ppm NaCl solution (0601.1, Roth). All plates were photographed before and after the staining procedures. The enzymatic indices were calculated by dividing the zones of clearing by the colony size.

In planta bacterial RNA-Seq

The in planta Xanthomonas L148 RNA-Seq was done in accordance to Nobori et al.⁷³. Briefly, two-week-old plants grown in agar plates were flood-inoculated with Xanthomonas L148 (OD₆₀₀ = 0.005 in 10 mM MgCl₂) and shoots of ~150 plants were harvested and pooled per sample at 2 dpi when bacterial populations were similar between Col-0 and rbohD plants. Samples were harvested, snap-frozen in liquid N₂, and stored at -80 °C until RNA extraction. The whole experiment was repeated three times. Samples were crushed with metal beads and incubated for 24 h at 4 °C with the isolation buffer⁷³. Bacterial cells were separated from the plant tissue through 6 μm filter mesh and centrifugation at 1300 g for 10 s. The RNA was isolated from the bacterial pellets using TRIzol (15596026, Invitrogen) and were treated with Turbo DNase (AM1907, Invitrogen) prior to sending to the Max Planck-Genome-Centre Cologne for RNA Sequencing with plant ribo-depletion and cDNA library construction (Universal Prokaryotic RNA-Seq Library Preparation Kit, Tecan) using the Illumina HiSeq 3000 system with 150 bp strand-specific single-end reads resulting in ~10 million reads per sample. The resulting reads were mapped to the Xanthomonas L148 genome²⁵ using the align() function with the default parameters in Rsubread package⁷⁴ to generate BAM files. Mapping rates ranged from 20–46%, which is within the expected values³². Mapped reads were counted using DESeq2⁷⁵ using the function featureCounts() from the BAM files and were normalized using the voom() function in limma package⁷⁶ prior to analysis. RNA-Seq raw reads and processed data were deposited in the NCBI GEO repository with accession number GSE226583.

Upon passing quality checks (assessing batch effects through PCA and MA plots for data dispersion), differentially expressed genes were determined using a linear model (gene expression ~0 + genotype + rep; contrast = Col-0 – rbohD) and Empirical Bayes statistics with eBayes() function in limma⁷⁶. False discovery rates were accounted for p-values using qvalue⁷⁷. The threshold for significantly differentially expressed genes was set to q-value < 0.05. Principal component analysis was done using the prcomp function⁷⁸; the optimal number of clusters was determined using NbClust() function in NbClust package⁷⁹, cluster memberships were computed with the k-means algorithm⁸⁰, heatmaps were generated using Heatmap() function in ComplexHeatmap package⁸¹, and pathway enrichment analysis was done for each of the identified gene clusters using enricher() function in clusterProfiler package in R⁸².

Synthetic community experiment

Two-week-old plants grown in agar plates in a chamber at 23 °C/23 °C (day/night) with 10 h of light were flood-inoculated with Xanthomonas L148 with or without the leaf-derived synthetic communities (LeafSC, 9 leaf prevalent and functional leaf isolates^27,28,29) in two different doses: L148_P1 + LeafSC contains equal portions of each strain including L148 in the inoculum (Xanthomonas L148/LeafSC, 1:9, each strain would have a final OD₆₀₀ = 0.01 totaling to OD₆₀₀ = 0.09 for LeafSC) and L148_P9 + Leaf SC contains a population of Xanthomonas L148 that equals the entire bacterial load of the LeafSC (Xanthomonas L148/LeafSC, 9:9, L148 and the LeafSC at OD₆₀₀ = 0.09), and were incubated in the same growth chamber. Plants were phenotyped for shoot fresh weights at 14 dpi (See Supplementary Data 1 for list of bacterial strains).

Protective function experiment

Two-week-old plants grown in agar plates in a chamber at 23 °C/23 °C (day/night) with 10 h of light were flood-inoculated with Xanthomonas L148 strains (OD₆₀₀ = 0.005) and incubated for 5 days. Pto lux⁶⁶ (OD = 0.005) or water was aseptically spray-inoculated (~200 µL per plate) onto the pre-colonized plants. Samples were collected at 0 and 3 dpi to count L148 and Pto colonies for different leaf compartments. For the total compartment, leaves were directly homogenized, serially diluted, and plated; for the endophytic compartment, leaves were surface-sterilized with 70% ethanol for 1 min, washed twice with sterile water, homogenized, serially diluted, and then plated. Colonies were allowed to grow on 0.5× TSB agar at 28 °C, and photographs were taken for 1–3 days. Colonies of the Pto lux⁶⁶ were differentiated against Xanthomonas L148 strains via their color and luminescence, and colonization was expressed as cfu mg⁻¹ leaf sample.

qPCR analysis

Bacterial RNA was isolated from plant samples inoculated with Xanthomonas L148 2 dpi or from bacterial pellets from Xanthomonas L148 grown in 0.5x TSB with or without 10 µM PQ using TRIzol (15596026, Invitrogen) followed by treatment with Turbo DNase (AM1907, Invitrogen). The cDNA libraries were synthesized with 1 μg RNA input using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (18064-014, Invitrogen) and random hexamers as primers following the manufacturer’s instructions. An input of 50 ng of cDNA was used for qPCR analyses (CFX Connect Real-Time System, Biorad) of the bacterial genes (please see Supplementary Data 6 for the list of primers and genes tested). The ΔCq was computed by subtracting the Cq of the gene-of-interest from the Cq of the gyrA gene from Xanthomonas L148.

Statistical analysis

The R programming environment (R version 4.2.2) was used for data analysis and visualization⁷⁸. No statistical test was implemented to predetermine the sample size. The experiments were done in a randomized manner wherein plants were shuffled weekly inside the growth chambers during the course of the experiment. The investigators were not blinded due to the strong rbohD plant phenotype in response to Xanthomonas L148. The data were inspected for the assumptions of the linear model (homoscedasticity, independence, and normality) and were normalized, if necessary, prior to statistical analysis using two-sided ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s HSD test or the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test for multiple comparisons using the package agricolae⁸³. No data was excluded from the analyses.

Genomic interrogation for CAZyme functions

Genomes for Xanthomonas L148 and other Xanthomonadales strains within the AtSPHERE²⁵ and known Xanthomonas pathogens (downloaded from NCBI; Sayers, et al.) were annotated for CAZyme functions (http://www.cazy.org/)⁸⁴ using the eggnog mapper (http://eggnog-mapper.embl.de/)⁸⁵ to determine the CAZyme repertoire of the bacterial strains and their potential substrates⁸⁶.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The in planta bacterial RNA-Seq data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database with the accession number GSE226583. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

Müller, D. B., Vogel, C., Bai, Y. & Vorholt, J. A. The plant microbiota: systems-level insights and perspectives. Annu. Rev. Genet. 50, 211–234 (2016).

Article
PubMed

Google Scholar
Drew, G. C., Stevens, E. J. & King, K. C. Microbial evolution and transitions along the parasite-mutualist continuum. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 19, 623–638 (2021).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Jochum, L. & Stecher, B. Label or concept—what is a pathobiont? Trends Microbiol. 28, 789–792 (2020).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Caballero, F. G., Pickard, J. M., & Nunez, G. Microbiota-mediated colonization resistance: mechanisms and regulation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 347–360 (2023).
Dodds, P. N. & Rathjen, J. P. Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant-pathogen interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 539–548 (2010).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Zipfel, C. et al. Bacterial disease resistance in Arabidopsis through flagellin perception. Nature 428, 764–767 (2004).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Zipfel, C. et al. Perception of the bacterial PAMP EF-Tu by the receptor EFR restricts Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Cell 125, 749–760 (2006).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Roux, M. et al. The Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases BAK1/SERK3 and BKK1/SERK4 are required for innate immunity to hemibiotrophic and biotrophic pathogens. Plant Cell 23, 2440–2455 (2011).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Miya, A. et al. CERK1, a LysM receptor kinase, is essential for chitin elicitor signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19613–19618 (2007).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Boller, T. & Felix, G. A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 60, 379–406 (2009).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Xin, X. F. et al. Bacteria establish an aqueous living space in plants crucial for virulence. Nature 539, 524–529 (2016).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Chen, T. et al. A plant genetic network for preventing dysbiosis in the phyllosphere. Nature 580, 653–657 (2020).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Torres, M. A., Dangl, J. L. & Jones, J. D. Arabidopsis gp91phox homologues AtrbohD and AtrbohF are required for accumulation of reactive oxygen intermediates in the plant defense response. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 517–522 (2002).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Castro, B. et al. Stress-induced reactive oxygen species compartmentalization, perception and signalling. Nat. Plants 7, 403–412 (2021).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Bolwell, G. P.& Daudi, A. Reactive oxygen species in plant pathogen interactions. In Reactive Oxygen Species in Plant Signaling and Communication in Plants 2nd edn, Vol. 3 (eds Rio, L. & Puppo, A.) Ch. 452 (Springer, 2009).
Song, Y. et al. FERONIA restricts Pseudomonas in the rhizosphere microbiome via regulation of reactive oxygen species. Nat. Plants 7, 644–654 (2021).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Pfeilmeier, S. et al. The plant NADPH oxidase RBOHD is required for microbiota homeostasis in leaves. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 852–864 (2021).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Tzipilevich, E., Russ, D., Dangl, J. L. & Benfey, P. N. Plant immune system activation is necessary for efficient root colonization by auxin-secreting beneficial bacteria. Cell Host Microb. 29, 1507–1520.e4 (2021).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar
Kadota, Y. et al. Direct regulation of the NADPH oxidase RBOHD by the PRR-associated kinase BIK1 during plant immunity. Mol. Cell 54, 43–55 (2014).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Salmond, G. P. Secretion of extracellular virulence factors by plant pathogenic bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 32, 181–200 (1994).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar
Tampakaki, A. P. Commonalities and differences of T3SSs in rhizobia and plant pathogenic bacteria. Front. plant Sci. 5, 114 (2014).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Kambara, K. et al. Rhizobia utilize pathogen-like effector proteins during symbiosis. Mol. Microbiol. 71, 92–106 (2009).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Maekawa, T., Kufer, T. A. & Schulze-Lefert, P. NLR functions in plant and animal immune systems: so far and yet so close. Nat. Immunol. 12, 817–826 (2011).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Teixeira, P. J. P. L. et al. Specific modulation of the root immune system by a community of commensal bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2100678118 (2021).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Bai, Y. et al. Functional overlap of the Arabidopsis leaf and root microbiota. Nature 528, 364–369 (2015).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Nobori, T. et al. Dissecting the cotranscriptome landscape of plants and their microbiota. EMBO Rep. 23, e55380 (2022).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Carlström, C. I. et al. Synthetic microbiota reveal priority effects and keystone strains in the Arabidopsis phyllosphere. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1445–1454 (2019).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Thiergart, T. et al. Root microbiota assembly and adaptive differentiation among European Arabidopsis populations. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 122–131 (2020).

Article
PubMed

Google Scholar
Karasov, T. L. et al. Arabidopsis thaliana and pseudomonas pathogens exhibit stable associations over evolutionary timescales. Cell Host Microb. 24, 168–179.e4 (2018).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar
Cianciotto, N. P. Type II secretion: a protein secretion system for all seasons. Trends Microbiol. 13, 581–588 (2005).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Nobori, T. et al. Transcriptome landscape of a bacterial pathogen under plant immunity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E3055–E3064 (2018).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Vogel, C. M., Potthoff, D. B., Schäfer, M., Barandun, N. & Vorholt, J. A. Protective role of the Arabidopsis leaf microbiota against a bacterial pathogen. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 1537–1548 (2021).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Veluchamy, S., Hind, S. R., Dunham, D. M., Martin, G. B. & Panthee, D. R. Natural variation for responsiveness to flg22, flgII-28, and csp22 and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato in heirloom tomatoes. PloS One 9, e106119 (2014).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Stringlis, I. A. et al. Root transcriptional dynamics induced by beneficial rhizobacteria and microbial immune elicitors reveal signatures of adaptation to mutualists. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 93, 166–180 (2018).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar
Parys, K. et al. Signatures of antagonistic pleiotropy in a bacterial flagellin epitope. Cell Host Microb. 29, 620–634.e9 (2021).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar
Colaianni, N. R. et al. A complex immune response to flagellin epitope variation in commensal communities. Cell Host Microb. 29, 635–649.e9 (2021).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar
Clasen, S. J. et al. Silent recognition of flagellins from human gut commensal bacteria by Toll-like receptor 5. Sci. Immunol. 8, eabq7001 (2023).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Spindler, M. P. et al. Human gut microbiota stimulate defined innate immune responses that vary from phylum to strain. Cell Host Microb. 30, 1481–1498.e5 (2022).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar
Durán, P. et al. Microbial interkingdom interactions in roots promote Arabidopsis survival. Cell 175, 973–983.e14 (2018).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Ma, K. W. et al. Coordination of microbe–host homeostasis by crosstalk with plant innate immunity. Nat. Plants 7, 814–825 (2021).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Shalev, O. et al. Commensal Pseudomonas strains facilitate protective response against pathogens in the host plant. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 383–396 (2022).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Wolinska, K. W. et al. Tryptophan metabolism and bacterial commensals prevent fungal dysbiosis in Arabidopsis roots. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2111521118 (2021).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Jakob, K. et al. Pseudomonas viridiflava and P. syringae-natural pathogens of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microb. Interact. MPMI 15, 1195–1203 (2002).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar
Agler, M. T. et al. Microbial hub taxa link host and abiotic factors to plant microbiome variation. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002352 (2016).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Yardeni, T. et al. Host mitochondria influence gut microbiome diversity: a role for ROS. Sci. Signal. 12, eaaw3159 (2019).

Article
PubMed

Google Scholar
Miller, B. M. et al. Anaerobic respiration of NOX1-derived hydrogen peroxide licenses bacterial growth at the colonic curface. Cell Host Microb. 28, 789–797.e5 (2020).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar
Denness, L. et al. Cell wall damage-induced lignin biosynthesis is regulated by a reactive oxygen species- and jasmonic acid-dependent process in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 156, 1364–1374 (2011).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Fujita, S. et al. SCHENGEN receptor module drives localized ROS production and lignification in plant roots. EMBO J. 39, e103894 (2020).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Miller, G. et al. The plant NADPH oxidase RBOHD mediates rapid systemic signaling in response to diverse stimuli. Sci. Signal. 2, ra45 (2009).

Article
PubMed

Google Scholar
Kwak, J. M. et al. NADPH oxidase AtrbohD and AtrbohF genes function in ROS-dependent ABA signaling in Arabidopsis. The. EMBO J. 22, 2623–2633 (2003).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Sierla, M., Waszczak, C., Vahisalu, T. & Kangasjärvi, J. Reactive oxygen species in the regulation of stomatal movements. Plant Physiol. 171, 1569–1580 (2016).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Pfeilmeier, S. et al. Dysbiosis of a leaf microbiome is caused by enzyme secretion of opportunistic Xanthomonas strains. bioRvix https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.09.539948 (2023)
Expert, D. et al. Dickeya dadantii pectic enzymes necessary for virulence are also responsible for activation of the Arabidopsis thaliana innate immune system. Mol. Plant Pathol. 19, 313–327 (2018).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Ma, Z. et al. A phytophthora sojae glycoside hydrolase 12 protein is a major virulence factor during soybean infection and is recognized as a PAMP. Plant Cell 27, 2057–2072 (2015).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Leucine-rich repeat receptor-like gene screen reveals that Nicotiana RXEG1 regulates glycoside hydrolase 12 MAMP detection. Nat. Commun. 9, 594 (2018).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Gui, Y. J. et al. Verticillium dahliae manipulates plant immunity by glycoside hydrolase 12 proteins in conjunction with carbohydrate-binding module 1. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 1914–1932 (2017).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Teixeira, P. J. P., Colaianni, N. R., Fitzpatrick, C. R. & Dangl, J. L. Beyond pathogens: microbiota interactions with the plant immune system. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 49, 7–17 (2019).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Vetter, M., Karasov, T. L. & Bergelson, J. Differentiation between MAMP triggered defenses in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 12, e1006068 (2016).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Furukawa, T., Inagaki, H., Takai, R., Hirai, H. & Che, F. S. Two distinct EF-Tu epitopes induce immune responses in rice and Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant Microb. Interact. MPMI 27, 113–124 (2014).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar
Lacombe, S. et al. Interfamily transfer of a plant pattern-recognition receptor confers broad-spectrum bacterial resistance. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 365–369 (2010).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Nobori, T. et al. Multidimensional gene regulatory landscape of a bacterial pathogen in plants. Nat. Plants 6, 883–896 (2020).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Site-specific cleavage of bacterial MucD by secreted proteases mediates antibacterial resistance in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 10, 2853 (2019).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Wang, W. et al. An Arabidopsis secondary metabolite directly targets expression of the bacterial type III secretion system to inhibit bacterial virulence. Cell Host Microb. 27, 601–613.e7 (2020).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar
Lindsey, B. E. 3rd, Rivero, L., Calhoun, C. S., Grotewold, E. & Brkljacic, J. Standardized method for high-throughput sterilization of Arabidopsis seeds. J. Visual. Exp. Jove 17, 56587 (2017).

Google Scholar
Hinsch, M. & Staskawicz, B. Identification of a new Arabidopsis disease resistance locus, RPs4, and cloning of the corresponding avirulence gene, avrRps4, from Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi. Mol. Plant Microb. Interact. 9, 55–61 (1996).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar
Matsumoto, A. et al. A versatile Tn7 transposon-based bioluminescence tagging tool for quantitative and spatial detection of bacteria in plants. Plant Commun. 3, 100227 (2022).
Smith, J. M. & Heese, A. Rapid bioassay to measure early reactive oxygen species production in Arabidopsis leave tissue in response to living Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Methods 10, 6 (2014).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Merrell, D. S., Hava, D. L. & Camilli, A. Identification of novel factors involved in colonization and acid tolerance of Vibrio cholerae. Mol. Microbiol. 43, 1471–1491 (2002).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Kvitko, B. H. & Collmer, A. Construction of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 mutant and polymutant strains. Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton N. J. 712, 109–128 (2011).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar
Gibson, D. G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat. Methods 6, 343–345 (2011).

Article

Google Scholar
Kessler, B., de Lorenzo, V. & Timmis, K. N. Timmis. A general system to integrate lacZ fusions into the chromosomes of gram-negative eubacteria: regulation of the Pm-promotor of the Tol-plasmid studied with all controlling elements in monocopy. Mol. Gen. Genet. 233, 293–301 (1992).

Article
CAS
PubMed

Google Scholar
Wengelnik, K., Marie, C., Russel, M. & Bonas, U. Expression and localization of HrpA1, a protein of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria essential for pathogenicity and induction ofthe hypersensitive reaction. J. Bacteriol. 178, 1061–1069 (1996).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Nobori, T. & Tsuda, K. In planta transcriptome analysis of Pseudomonas syringae. Bio. Protoc. 8, e2987 (2018).

Article
CAS
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. “The R package Rsubread is easier, faster, cheaper and better for alignment and quantification of RNA sequencing reads.”. Nuc. Acids Res. 47, e47 (2019).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. “Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.”. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Ritchie, M. E. et al. “limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies.”. Nuc. Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).

Article

Google Scholar
Storey, J. D., Bass, A. J., Dabney, A., Robinson, D. et al. qvalue: Q-Value Estimation for False Discovery Rate Control http://github.com/jdstorey/qvalue (2022).
Core Team, R. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing http://www.R-project.org/ (2013).
Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V. & Niknafs, A. NbClust: An R package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set. J. Stat. Softw. 61, 1–36 (2014).

Article

Google Scholar
Struyf, A., Hubert, M. & Rousseeuw, P. “Clustering in an object-oriented environment.” J. Statist. Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v001.i04 (1997).
Gu, Z. “Complex Heatmap Visualization” https://doi.org/10.1002/imt2.43 (2022).
Wu T. et al. “ClusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data.” Innovation 2, 100141 (2021).
Mendiburu, F. & Yaseen, M. Agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research https://myaseen208.github.io/agricolae/https://cran.r-project.org/package=agricolae (2020).
Drula, E. et al. The carbohydrate-active enzyme database: functions and literature. Nuc. Acids Res. 50, D571–D577 (2022).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar
Cantalapiedra, C. P., Hernandez-Plaza, A., Letunic, I., Bork, P. & Huerta-Cepas, J. eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 5825.5829 (2021).

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central

Google Scholar
Zheng, J. et al. dbCAN-seq update: CAZyme gene clusters and substrates in microbiomes. Nuc. Acids Res. 51, D557–D563 (2023).

Article
CAS

Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Neysan Donnelly for editing and Wanqing Jiang for providing helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32250710139 to K.T.), the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFA1304403 to K.T.), HZAU-AGIS Cooperation Fund (SZYJY2021007 to K.T. and X.H.), the Max Planck Society (to P.S.-L and K.T.), and a German Research Foundation (DFG) grant (SPP2125) (to P.S.-L and K.T.).

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

National Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Hubei Key Laboratory of Plant Pathology, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China

Frederickson Entila, Xiaowei Han & Kenichi Tsuda
Department of Plant Microbe Interactions, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linne-Weg 10, Cologne, 50829, Germany

Frederickson Entila, Paul Schulze-Lefert & Kenichi Tsuda
Shenzhen Institute of Nutrition and Health, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China

Xiaowei Han & Kenichi Tsuda
Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Genome Analysis Laboratory of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518120, China

Xiaowei Han & Kenichi Tsuda
JST PRESTO, Kawaguchi-shi, Saitama, 332-0012, Japan

Akira Mine
Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan

Akira Mine

Authors

Frederickson Entila

View author publications

You can also search for this author in
PubMed Google Scholar
Xiaowei Han

View author publications

You can also search for this author in
PubMed Google Scholar
Akira Mine

View author publications

You can also search for this author in
PubMed Google Scholar
Paul Schulze-Lefert

View author publications

You can also search for this author in
PubMed Google Scholar
Kenichi Tsuda

View author publications

You can also search for this author in
PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

F.E. and K.T. conceived the research. F.E., X.H., P.S.-L., and K.T. designed the research. A.M. designed and constructed Pto lux. F.E. performed all of the experimental work and the analysis of the data. F.E. and K.T. wrote the manuscript with input from all the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to
Kenichi Tsuda.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Supplementary Data 5

Supplementary Data 6

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Entila, F., Han, X., Mine, A. et al. Commensal lifestyle regulated by a negative feedback loop between Arabidopsis ROS and the bacterial T2SS.
Nat Commun 15, 456 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-44724-2

Download citation

Received: 09 May 2023
Accepted: 02 January 2024
Published: 11 January 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-44724-2

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.